Counterfactual crypto

Октябрь 2, 2012

Disida

1 comments

counterfactual crypto

When smart contract – software – is deployed on a blockchain, it gains the blockchain's immutability, making the transactions unalterable. More. State channels are a scalability technology for ethereum enabling instant & free peer-to-peer ethereum transactions. Keywords: counterfactual; robustness; security; correctness; anonymity; noise-tolerance level. 1. Introduction. Quantum cryptography has. OKLAHOMA SPORTS BOOK

The way of the future. No more wait times. No more high gas fees. No more fails. Users no longer need cumbersome private keys and mnemonics. Users can ensure their assets are secure by choosing their trustworthy security team. The Loopring Smart Wallet is an Ethereum wallet that is managed by a smart contract instead of a mnemonic seed phrase.

By using a smart contract, the wallet allows the user to enjoy advanced features and security such as Social Recovery, lock protection, daily limits, , and more eliminating the single point of failure common in a normal wallet. A further advantage lies in ensuring that only current versions can be used. The current version of a counterfactual wallet is retrieved from the underlying smart contract.

If the code of the smart contract is updated or expanded, all counterfactual wallets based on it will immediately receive an update, for example to close security gaps or expand the functions. The first possibility of restoring access to counterfactual wallets can work, for example, via a so-called social recovery feature. A group of other participants in the blockchain is automatically defined, which can change the private keys of the crypto wallet in question through majority cooperation at the corresponding request of the wallet owner.

What about the permit requirement? According to the wording of the law, the crypto custody business that requires a license includes the safekeeping, management and security of crypto assets or private cryptographic keys. The decentralized design of counterfactual wallets could initially speak against a permit requirement for providers.

However, this is supported by the fact that there are also private keys for counterfactual wallets, which must be kept, managed and secured against unauthorized access by third parties. In crypto services with integrated wallet services, the provider always takes on this task for its customers. In the case of counterfactual wallets, there is also the task of setting guardians.

If social recovery is required, the provider must request it and again properly store, manage, and secure the new private keys. The fact that counterfactual wallets are not executed centrally in the IT structure of a provider, but via a smart contract on a blockchain, is irrelevant with regard to the handling of the associated private keys.